Naive terminal labels were wrong in real Harness scenarios
A semantic reconstruction result for selected scenarios, not general accuracy.
TOWOW RESEARCH · FORMAL PAPER RECORD
Formal paper v1.1 · A historical archive of a theory and research program
This English guide introduces a paper that places actors, relations, authority, execution, real-world effect, and acceptance in one frame. It is a historical research slice, not a replacement for the current research state and not a product capability claim.

01 · RESEARCH QUESTION
The paper asks who represents which Principal, under what Authority, RelationVersion, and Commitment; how an action moves from an attempt into the target world; and who owns the facts and decisions for Effect, Adoption, and Acceptance.
02 · FOUR FACTS THE RESEARCH KEEPS SEPARATE
Did an action, call, or message enter an execution path?
Did the target world change in a way the target can read back?
Did the change enter the code, service, relationship, or workflow that consumes it?
Did the currently responsible party or system make the corresponding acceptance decision?
03 · BOUNDARIES OF THE PUBLIC RESULTS
A semantic reconstruction result for selected scenarios, not general accuracy.
Stdout and outer exit status each correctly indicated 4/9; a minimal Effect contract plus target-native readback reached 9/9. These are not one accuracy rate.
Richer terms do not equal relation formation, adoption, or target acceptance.
Infrastructure, a manifest, or a static validator cannot become a comparison result.
04 · TOWOW × FLOWNESS
ToWow studies discovery, negotiation, relation formation, and acceptance across Principals. Flowness studies how work inside a domain retains identity, context, Findings, commit boundaries, and acceptance evidence. Flowness is a possible execution and evidence substrate for a ToWow deployment, but the current material does not establish a completed product integration.
Principal, Authority, RelationVersion, Commitment, Effect, and Acceptance.
Event truth, context compilation, Commit Gate, independent review, and retained evidence.
05 · ARCHIVE AND CURRENT STATE
The paper places actors, relations, authority, execution, real-world effect, and acceptance in one theoretical frame. It is a formal archive and cannot replace later experiments, negative results, or current boundaries.
The current public judgment retains corrections including an incomplete product loop, fair comparison actual runs=0, and unverified human and long-term real-world validity.
06 · PUBLIC READING PATHS
Start with the public derivative, then follow each numerical claim to its study page and data snapshot. Use SHA-256 to verify the package before or after reading it.
Preferred citation